Scott's article about the "feud" is required reading for anyone interested in the back story behind Saban's hip shot at pay for play.
There is enough in the article to stimulate thought as to how and in what form a super conference can operate within the existing collegiate/Title IX structure. Like it or not elite college football hardly needs the schools that it purports to represent, especially if the pay for NIL comes from sources outside of academia and taxes and athletes can change schools like dirty shirts.
Clearly the most significant casualty in all of this is the value of a degree when the purpose of enrolling is football or basketball and how much is being forked over to play. A secondary casualty might well be us, unless we have become so jaded we no longer care if the jock attends school or not as long as he/she delivers in the name of Duck. Sic transit gloria school pride.
Clearly the messy sausage making of elite league football must resolve include the pesky details of what the school requires of its hired hands to attend class and make grades while majoring in pigskin. And it's not unreasonable to visualize a day when the. only relationship between academia and elite sports is the value of the school name, colors and mascot to an independent entity that otherwise has no practical need for the school... except for a deluded fan base that fills stadiums while clinging to the fiction that it's the quality of education that wins on Saturday afternoons.
Along with the loss of innocence is the reality that college alumni are the recipients of the largesse of OPM, other people's money. And perhaps it best that we consider this rather than opening a vein after a disappointing afternoon loss at Autzen....or Athens.