Ok...I have been wondering about this all season and now that the season is over, maybe its time to ask about it.
As we all know, we had a very young and inexperienced secondary this year, yet most of the kids were highly rated coming in.
Why is it then that from almost the first of the season I have heard the coaches talking about simplifying the defensive schemes for these kids.
In fact I have heard through out most of the season that the coaches kept "dumbing down" the schemes.
I get the inexperience part but......
Am I to believe that these kids are stupid? Can't buy that.
Am I to believe that the coaches are not very good teachers? Neal seems pretty good.
Am I to believe that the scheme is just way to complicated?
And if the scheme has to be dumbed down for our players, doesn't that give an advantage to our opponents? (yes).
I truly do not know the answer.
Any thoughts?
Corey
As we all know, we had a very young and inexperienced secondary this year, yet most of the kids were highly rated coming in.
Why is it then that from almost the first of the season I have heard the coaches talking about simplifying the defensive schemes for these kids.
In fact I have heard through out most of the season that the coaches kept "dumbing down" the schemes.
I get the inexperience part but......
Am I to believe that these kids are stupid? Can't buy that.
Am I to believe that the coaches are not very good teachers? Neal seems pretty good.
Am I to believe that the scheme is just way to complicated?
And if the scheme has to be dumbed down for our players, doesn't that give an advantage to our opponents? (yes).
I truly do not know the answer.
Any thoughts?
Corey
